2006-11
Nov-01
Abstract
書後索引的編製是一種檢索系統的設計開發工作,也是一種主題分析的過程。研究者希望能以工作領域分析的角度,了解索引編製工作的程序,建立一書籍索引工作程序的理解模型,藉此能夠更深入的探討書籍索引工作的本質。
研究者透過三個書後索引個案,以及十二位索引工作者的訪談,提出以下發現:
- 手段-目的:對目的的認知、對讀者的想像
- 活動分析:
- 決策分析:編輯決策、語義決策
研究者進一步比較相關書後索引研究
Nov-07
- Carroll, John M.(ed.)(2003). HCI models, theories, and frameworks : toward a multidisciplinary science
- an introduction of general system thinking;
Nov-08
- 印到 中央大學那篇五合一,citation不知道該放那個?
- Cognitive work analysis in Vicente (1999). Cognitive Work Analysis. he defined those term:
- Actor - A worker or automation
- Cognitive work analysis - The framework of Work Analysis described in this book. It is based on the concept of Behavior-Shaping Constraints and contains models of the Work Domain, control tasks, Strategies, social-organizational factors, and Worker competencies in a single, integrated framework.
- Constraints (約束) - Relationships between, or limits on. Behavior. Constraints remove Degrees of Freedom.
- Rasmussen's (1986) framework for Cognitive Work Analysis (CWA) [Rasmussen, J. (1986). Information Processing and Human-Machine Interaction: An Approach to Cognitive Engineering. New York: North-Holland.] http://www.mie.utoronto.ca/labs/cel/research/frameworks/cwa.htm
Nov-12
- 申請文獻傳遞 Cognitive systems engineering / Jens Rasmussen, Annelise Mark Pejtersen, L.P. Goodstein.
Nov-14
- Rasmussen, J., Pejtersen, A., & Schmidt, K. (1990). Taxonomy for cognitive work analysis. Riso National Laboratory.
- Fidel, R., & Pejtersen, A. M. (2005). Cognitive work analysis. In K. E. Fisher, S. Erdelez & L. McKechnie (Eds.), Theories of information behavior (pp. 88-93): Informatio Today.
- 修改 mime.conf,可上傳備份 endnotes書目檔。 :data:attic:research:bob-indexing:indexing.enl
Nov-15
- Rasmussen, J., Pejtersen, A., & Schmidt, K. (1990). Taxonomy for cognitive work analysis. Riso National Laboratory.
Nov-16
- 借到 Cognitive systems engineering
- 博蘭尼:個人知識:概念
- 去印「博蘭尼講演集」?
Nov-17
- 印 Cognitive systems engineering
- 印「博蘭尼講演集」
- Taxonomy of cognitive work
Nov-18
- George Kelly 人格理論
Nov-20
- Rasmussen, J., Pejtersen, A., & Schmidt, K. (1990). Taxonomy for cognitive work analysis. Riso National Laboratory.
Nov-23
- System perspective and information behavior research.
- 賴鼎銘 (1992)。資訊需求與使用研究的典範變遷。教育資料與圖書館學(30-1),頁36-52。
資訊行為研究的典範:傳統與系統典範,與Dervin 對系統典範的批判,並提出新的替代典範:使用者導向典範。 - Dervin & Nilan (1986)
- Pettigrew, K. E., Fidel, R., & Bruce, H. (2001). Conceptual frameworks in information behavior. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology(ARIST), 35, 43-78.
- 其他使用者研究與系統研究:
- 其他系統觀點?“A general system thinking”
Nov-24
- to be modified: basic modeling problems
Nov-27
我並非真正科學界之人,不是真的科學人、不是觀察者、不是實驗者也不是思想家。我什麼都不是,不過在性情上是個征服者–冒險者,如果你硬要解釋這個名詞的話,具有屬於這種人的好奇心,大膽和固執。如果這種人成功,如果他們真發現某事,他們往往會被當成寶藏;否則的話,他們會被丟棄一旁。 – 佛洛伊德寫給弗里士的信件,《佛洛伊德檔案》,頁 137
* Pettigrew, K. E., Fidel, R., & Bruce, H. (2001). Conceptual frameworks in information behavior. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology(ARIST), 35, 43-78.
Nov-28
- Pettigrew, K. E., Fidel, R., & Bruce, H. (2001). Conceptual frameworks in information behavior. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology(ARIST), 35, 43-78.
- Rasmussen, J., Pejtersen, A. M., & Goodstein, L. P. (1994). Cognitive systems engineering. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
- Wilson, T. D. (1999). Models in information behaviour research. Journal of Documentation, 55(3), 249-270. [http://informationr.net/tdw/publ/papers/1999JDoc.html]
- thesis: cwa_work_domain_analysis_intro
Nov-29
- Rasmussen, J., Pejtersen, A. M., & Goodstein, L. P. (1994). Cognitive systems engineering. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
- thesis: cwa_work_domain_analysis_intro
Nov-30
- Benoit, G. (2002). Toward a critical theoretic perspective in information systems. Library Quarterly, 72(4), 441-471.
- 林珊如(2002)。網路使用者特行與資訊行為研究趨勢之探討。圖書資訊學刊(17),35-47。
- 葉乃靜(2001)。慣習與資訊行為。資訊傳播與圖書館學,8(1),87-94。
- 賴鼎銘(1992)。資訊需求與使用研究的典範變遷。教育資料與圖書館學,30(1),36-52。
- 社會世界的現象學 / 舒茲(A. Schutz)著 ; 盧嵐蘭譯