==[博班]分類編目理論研討 台大==

Seminar in Cataloging and Classification Theories \\ 
98學年度下學期 藍文欽 (lanw@ntu.edu.tw)

=== 課程簡介===

本課程旨在探討圖書資訊組織與書目控制的理論基礎與原則，含括的主要內容如下：
# 熟悉中外有關圖書分類編目理論的重要文獻及書目語言(bibliographical language)的特性。
# 探討資訊世界(information universe)的意涵及資訊組織的目標。
# 探討資訊/知識呈現（information/knowledge representation）與書目控制之原則與理論。
# 從哲學、認知、語言、生物、書目等觀點，研討分類的基本理論與原則。
# 探討圖書分類的理論與原則，並以此為基礎分析比較一些圖書分類體系的架構與特色。


===課程進度===
==== 2月23日 Introduction / Theory and LIS ====
[Case for discussion: PI and Theoretical Framework of Descriptive Metadata]

* Bates, M. J. (2005). An Introduction to metatheories, theories, and models. In K. E. Fisher, S. Erdelez, & L. McKechnie (Eds.), Theories of Information Behavior (pp. 1-29). Medford, NJ: Information Today.
* Odi, A. (1982). Creative research and theory building in library and information sciences. College and Research Libraries, 43(4), 312-319.
* Pettigrew, K. E., & McDechnie L. (2001). The Use of Theory in Information Science Research. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(1), 62-73.
* (optional）
** 何光國（民90年）。圖書館學理論基礎，第二篇。
** Buckland, M. K. (1988). Library Services in Theory and Context. (2nd ed.) Oxford: Pergamon Press. Chap. 5.
** Budd, J. M. (2001). Knowledge and Knowing in Library and Information Science: A Philosophical Framework. Lanham: Scarecrow press. Chap. 4-5.
** Dubin, R. (1978). Theory Building. (Rev. ed.) New York: The Free Press. Chap. 2: Theory (pp. 15-32).
** Eamon, W. (1990). From the secrets of nature to public knowledge: The origins of the concept of openness in science. In D. C. Lindberg, & R. S. Westman (Eds.), Reappraisals of the Scientific Revolution (pp. 333-366). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
** Gibbs. J. P. (1972). Sociological Theory Construction. Hinsdale, Ill.: Dryden Press. Chap. 5.
** Glazier, J. D., & Grover, R. (2002). A multidisciplinary framework for theory building. Library Trends, 50(3), 317-329.
** Kuhn, D., Ansel, E., & O’Laughli, M. (1988). The Development of Scientific Thinking Skills. New York: Academic Press.
** McGrath, W. E. (2002). Explanation and prediction: Building a unified theory of librarianship, concept and review. Library Trends, 50(3), 350-371. 
** Reynolds, P. D. (1978). Concepts, statements, and scientific knowledge. In A. Wells (Ed.), Contemporary Sociological Theories (pp. 52-77). Santa Monica, CA: Goodyear Pub.
** Vickery, B. (1997). Metatheory and information science.  Journal of Documentation, 53(5), 457-476.
** Carpenter, M., & Svenonius, E. (Eds.) (1985). Foundations of Cataloging: A Sourcebook.
** Chan, L. M., Richmond, P. A., & Svenonius, E. (Eds.) (1985). Theory of Subject Analysis: A Sourcebook.
** McGrath,W. E. (Ed.) (2002). Current Theory in Library and Information Science. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois, Graduate School of Library and Information Science.
** Svenonius, E. (Ed.) (1989). The Conceptual Foundations of Descriptive Cataloging.
** Theory Building [Bibliography], prepared by the Center for Positive Practices, available online: http://www.positivepractices.com/ResearchDesign/index.html#TheoryBuilding1997
====3月2日 我國古代有關分類編目理論的重要文獻====

* [[:people:荀子]]，正名篇
* [[:people:公孫龍]]子，指物論、白馬論、堅白論、名實論
* [[:people:毋煚]]，古今書錄序（附於舊唐書經籍志中）
* [[:people:鄭樵]]，通志校讎略
* [[:people:胡應麟]]，經籍會通
* [[:people:祁承業]]，庚申整書略例
* [[:people:章學誠]]，校讎通義，原道、宗劉、互著、別裁等篇
* (optional）
** 墨子，經說。
** 何光國(民79)，圖書資訊組織原理，第八章第一節。
** 周彥文(民84)，中國目錄學理論。
** 左玉河（2004），從四部之學到七科之學：學術分科與近代中國知識系統之創建。
** 傅榮賢(民88)，中國古代圖書分類學研究。
** 楊家駱主編（民66）。校讎學系編。台北市：鼎文書局。
====3月9日 Bibliographic Objectives / Bibliographic Entities ====

* [[:study:Svenonius, E. (2000). The Intellectual Foundation of Information Organization]], chap. 2.
* [[:study:Svenonius, E. (2000). The Intellectual Foundation of Information Organization]], chap. 3.
* [[:study:Wilson, P. (1989). Interpreting the second objective of the catalog]]. The Library Quarterly, 59(4), 339-353.
* [[:study:Buckland, M. K. (1997). What is a document?]] Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 48(9): 804-9. 
* [FRBR]Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records: Final Report. Chap. 3, Entities.
* (optional）
** Buckland, M. (1998). What is a “digital document.” Available online: http://www.sims.berkeley.edu/~buckland/digdoc.html
** Clapp, V. W. (1950). The role of bibliographic organization in contemporary civilization. In J. H. Shera, & M. E. Egan (Eds.), Bibliographic Organization, pp. 3-23. 
** Carlyle, Allyson (1997). Fulfilling the second objective in the online catalog: Schemes for organizing author and work records into usable displays. Library Resources & Technical Services, 41(2): 79-100.
** Francke, H. (2005). What's in a name? Contextualizing the Document concept. Literary and Linguistic Computing,  20(1), 61-69. 
** Frohmann, B. (2004a). Deflating information. From science studies to documentation. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. 
** Frohmann, B. (2004b). Documentation redux: Prolegomena to (another) philosophy of information. Library Trends, 52(3), 387-407.
** Graham, Crystal (1990). Definition and scope of multiple versions. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 11(2): 5-32.
** Leazer, G. H., & Smiraglia, R. P. (1996). Toward the bibliographic control of works: Derivative bibliographic relationships in an online union catalog. In Digital Libraries ’96 (1st ACM International Conference on Digital Libraries, March 20-23, 1996, Bethesda, Maryland) (pp. 36-43). New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
** Osborn, Andrew D. (1985). The Crisis in Cataloging. In M. Carpenter, & E. Svenonius (Eds.), Foundations of Cataloging: A Sourcebook (pp.90-103). Littleton, Colo.: Libraries Unlimited.
** Principles for Library Catalogues and Other Bibliographic Files.  Available online – http://www.ddb.de/standardisierung/pdf/papers_muennich.pdf 
** Smiragliz, R. P. (2001), The Nature of A Work. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press.
** Smiraglia, R. P. (2003). The history of ‘the work’ in the modern catalog. Cataloging and Classification Quarterly, 35(3/4): 553-567.
** Verona, E. (1959). Literary unit versus bibliographical unit. Libri, 9(2): 79-104. Also in E. Svenonius (Ed.), The Conceptual Foundations of Descriptive Cataloging (pp. 79-104). New York: Academic, 1989.
** Wilson, P. (1968), Two Kinds of Power, chap. 1.
** Wilson, P. (1989). The second objective. In E. Svenonius (Ed.), The Conceptual Foundations of Descriptive Cataloging (pp. 5-16). New York: Academic.
** Yee, Martha M. (1994). Manifestation and near-equivalents: Theory, with special attention to moving-image materials. Library Resources & Technical Services, 38(3): 227-255.
** Yee, Martha M. (1997). What is a work? International Conferences on the Principles and Future Development of AACR, University of Toronto, Oct. 23-25. Available online: [[http:// http://collection.nlc-bnc.ca/100/200/300/jsc_aacr/whatis/r-whatis.pdf]]
====3月16日 Principles of Description (1)====

* [[:study:Shera, J. H. (1965). Foundations of a theory of bibliography]]. In D. J. Foskett (Ed.), Libraries and the Organization of Knowledge (pp. 18-33). London: Crosby Lockwood & Son Ltd.
* [[:study:Smiraglia, R. P. (2002). The progress of theory in knowledge organization]]. Library Trends, 50(3), 330-349.
* [[:study:Svenonius, E. (2000). The intellectual foundation of information organization]], chap. 5, 6, & 7.
* [[:study:Wilson, P. (1968), Two Kinds of Power]], chap. 2 & 3.
* (optional）
** De Rijk, E. (1991). Thomas Hyde, Julia Pettee and the development of cataloging principles; with a translation of Hyde’s 1674 preface to the reader. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 14(2): 31-62.
** Hagler, R. (1991). The Bibliographic Record and Information Technology (2nd ed.). Chicago: American Library Association. Chap. 1 & 2.
** Lubezky, S. (1969). Principles of Cataloging. Final Report. Phase I: Descriptive Cataloging. Los Angeles: University of California, Institute of Library Research.
** Smiraglia, R. P. (2001). Further progress toward theory in knowledge organization. Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science, 26(2/3), 31-50.
====3月23日 Principles of Description (2)====

* [[:study:Bates, M. J. (1998).  Indexing and access for digital libraries and the Internet]]: Human, database, and domain Factors. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49(13), 1185 - 1205.
* [[:study:Bates, M. J. (2003). Improving user access to library catalog and portal information]]: final report (version 3). Available online: http://www.loc.gov/catdir/bibcontrol/2.3BatesReport6-03.doc.pdf
* [[:study:Jacob, E. K., & Shaw, D. (1998). Sociocognitive perspectives on representation]]. In M. E. Williams (Ed.), Annual Review of Information Science & Technology, vol. 33 (pp. 131-185). Medford, NJ: Information Today. 
* [[:study:Swanson, D. R. (1988). Historical note]]: Information retrieval and the future of an illusion. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 39(2): 92-98.
* [[:study:Tillett, B. B. (2001). Bibliographic relationships]]. In Relationships in the Organization of Knowledge (pp. 19-35). 
* (optional）
** Barry, C. L. (1998). Document representations and clues to document relevance. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49(14), 1293-1303.
** Bates, M. J. (2002). Speculations on browsing, directed searching, and linking in relation to the Bradford distribution. In H. Bruce, R. Fidel, P. Ingwersen, & P. Vakkari (Eds.) Emerging Frameworks and Methods: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Conceptions of Library and Information Science (CoLIS 4), July 21-25, Seattle, WA (pp. 137-149). Libraries Unlimited, Greenwood Village. Available Online: http://www.gseis.ucla.edu/faculty/bates/articles/Searching_Bradford-m020430.html
** Green, R. (2001). Relationships in the organization of knowledge: An overview. In Relationships in the Organization of Knowledge (pp. 3-18).
** Tillett, B. B. (1991). A taxonomy of bibliographic relationships. Library Resources & Technical Services, 35(2): 150-158.
** Resnikoff, H.L., & Dolby, J.L. (1972) Access: A study of information storage and retrieval with emphasis on library information systems. Washington, DC: U.S. Dept. of Health, Education, and Welfare, Office of Education, Bureau of Research. [僅供參考，目前找不到原文。]
====3月30日 Scientific Knowledge ====
* [[:study:Giere, R. N. (2006). Scientific Perspectives]]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Ch1: Scientific Knowledge. Available online: http://www.tc.umn.edu/~giere/sp_ch1.pdf
* [[:study:Hacking, I. (1999). The Social Construction of What]]?. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. Chap. 3: What about the Natural Sciences? (pp.63-99).
* [[:study:Jevons, W. S. (1874). The Principles of Science]]: A Treatise on Logic and Scientific Method. New York: Dover. Chap. 1: Introduction.
* [[:study:Small, H. (2003). Paradigms, citations, and maps of science]]: A personal history. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(5), 394 - 399.
* (optional）
** Budd, J. M. (2001). Knowledge and Knowing in Library and Information Science, Chap. 1-3.
** Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. Garden City, NY: Doubleday. [中譯本：知識社會學: 社會實體的建構。台北市：巨流，民80。] Chap. 1.
** Kuhn, T. (1970). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Chap. 2: The Route to Normal Science.
** Snow, C. P.著；林志成、劉藍玉譯。兩種文化。台北市：貓頭鷹出版，2000。

====4月6日====
溫書假

====4月13日 Classification of Knowledge====

* [[:study:Kwasnik, B. H. (1999). The role of classification in knowledge representation and discovery]]. Library Trends 48(1): 22-47.
* Burke, P. (2000). A Social History of Knowledge: From Gutenberg to Diderot, chap. 5 : Classifying Knowledge.  [中譯本：知識社會史]
* Jevons, W. S. (1958). The Principles of Science: A Treatise on Logic and Scientific Method. New York: Dover. Chap. 30: Classification.
* Sokal, R. (1974). Classification: Purposes, principles, progress, prospects." Science, 185(no. 4157): 1115-1123.   (可由JSTOR Archive取得全文)
* Vickery, B. C. (1959). Classification and Indexing in Science, Appendix A: Historical Aspects of the Classification of Science (pp. 147-180).
* (optional）
** Bowker, G. C., & Star, S. L. (1999). Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences. Cambridge, Mass: The MIT Press. Introduction & Chap. 1.
** Flint, R. (1904). Philosophy as Scientia Scientiarum. 
** Foucault, M. (1973). The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences. New York: Vintage Books. Chap. 5: Classification; Chap. 10: The Human Sciences.
** Mayr, E. (1982). The Growth of Biological Thought: Diversity, Evolution, and Inheritance. Chap. 4.
** Wallerstein, I. (1996). Open the Social Sciences, report of the Gulbenkian Commission on the Restructuring of the Social Sciences. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.
** Whitley, Richard (2000). The Intellectual and Social Organization of the Sciences. 2nd ed. Oxford [England] : Oxford University Press, 2000.
** 王知津(1998)。知識組織的研究範圍及發展策略。中國圖書館學報，第4期，頁3-8。
** 王知津(1999)。知識空間：知識組織的概念基礎。中國圖書館學報，第5期，頁13-18。
** 吳萬鈞(1998)。科學知識組織系統。資訊傳播與圖書館學，5卷1期，頁19-42。

====4月20日 Class Presentation ====
Topic: The Application of Theories in the Organization of Information
* [[:study:Bourdieu, P. (1968). Outline of a sociological theory of art perception]]. International Social Science Journal, 20(4), 589-612.

====4月27日 Classification – From the Perspectives of Some Disciplines====
* [[:study:Mayr, E. (1982). The Growth of Biological Thought]]: Diversity, Evolution, and Inheritance,  Chap. 5.
* Ereshefsky, M. (2001). The Poverty of the Linnaean Hierarchy: A Philosophical Study of Biological Taxonomy. Chap. 2: A Primer of Biological Taxonomy.
* [[:study:Fuller, S. (1993). Disciplinary boundaries and the rhetoric of the social sciences]]. In E. Messer-Davidow, D. R. Shumway, & D. J. Sylvan (Eds.), Knowledge: Historical and Critical Studies in Disciplinarity (pp. 125-149). Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia.
* [[:study:Hacking, I. (1999). The Social Construction of What?]] Chap. 5: Kind-making: the case of child abuse
* (optional）
** Ereshefsky, M. (2001). The Poverty of the Linnaean Hierarchy: A Philosophical Study of Biological Taxonomy. Chap. 3, 7, & 8.
** Foucault, Michel. (1994). What is called “punishing”? In James D. Faubion (Ed.), Power: Essential Works of Foucault, 1954-1984 (pp. 382-393). New York: The New Press.
** Mayr, E. (1988). Toward a New Philosophy of Biology, Chap. 16: Toward a Synthesis in Biological Classification (pp. 268-288).
** Ørom, A. (2003). Knowledge Organization in the domain of Art Studies – History, Transition and Conceptual Changes. Knowledge Organization, 30(3/4), 128-143.
** Zerubavel, E. (1995). The rigid, the fuzzy, and the flexible: notes on the mental sculpting of academic identity. Social Research, 62: 1093-1107.
====5月4日 Categorization (1)====
* [[:study:Rosch, E. (1978). Principle of Categorization]]. In E. Rosch, & B. B. Lloyd (Eds.), Cognition and Categorization (pp. 27-48). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.  Also in A. Collins, & E. E. Smith (Eds.), Readings in Cognitive Science, a Perspective from Psychology and Artificial Intelligence (pp. 312-322). San Mateo, California, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers. Available online: http://originresearch.com/documents/rosch1b.htm 
* [[:study:Boodman, N. (1992). Seven Strictures on Similarity]]. In M. Douglas, & D. Hull (Eds.), How Classification Works: Nelson Goodman among the Social Sciences (pp. 13-23). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
* [[:study:Douglas, M. (1992). Rightness of Categories]]. In M. Douglas, & D. Hull (Eds.), How Classification Works: Nelson Goodman among the Social Sciences (pp. 239-271). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
* (optional）
** 亞里士多德著；，秦典華，余紀元譯（民91）。工具論。台北市：慧明文化。「範疇編」（頁17-58）。
** Lamberts, K., & Shanks, D. (Eds.) (1997), Knowledge, Concepts and Categories. Chap. 2 & 3.
** Rosch, E. (1977). Human categorization. In N. Warren (Ed.), Studies in Cross-cultural Psychology (V. 1, pp. 1-67). London: Academic Press.
====5月11日 Categorization (2)====
* [[:study:Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, Fire and Dangerous Things]]:  What Categories Reveal About the Mind. [中譯本：女人、火與危險事物] Chap. 1 - 3
====5月18日 Categorization (3)====
* [[:study:Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, Fire and Dangerous Things]]:  What Categories Reveal About the Mind. [中譯本：女人、火與危險事物] Chap. 4-6
====5月25日 Knowledge Domain====
(繳交讀書心得報告)		
* [[:study:Bates, M. J. (1999). The invisible substrate of information science]]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50 (12): 1043-1050.
* [[:study:Beghtol, C. (1998). Knowledge domains]]: Multidisciplinary and bibliographic classification systems. Knowledge Organization, 25(1/2): 1-12.
* [[:study:hjorland_b._albrechtsen_h._1995_._toward_a_new_horizon_in_information_science|Hjørland, B., & Albrechtsen, H. (1995). Toward a new horizon in information science: Domain-analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 46(6), 400-425.]]
* [[:study:Hjørland, B. (1997). Information Seeking and Subject Representation]], Ch 6: Science, Discipline, and Subject Field as a Framework for Information Seeking (pp. 135-157).
* [[:study:Zerubavel, E. (1995). The rigid, the fuzzy, and the flexible]]: Notes on the mental sculpting of academic identity. Social Research, 62(4), 1093-1107.
* (optional）
** Andrew, A. (1995). Things of boundaries. Social Research, 62(4), 857-882.
** Bates, M. J. (1998). Indexing and access for digital libraries and the Internet: Human, database, and domain factors. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49(13), 1185-1205.
** Beghtol, C. (1995). “Facets” as Interdisciplinary Undiscovered Public Knowledge.  Journal of Documentation, 51(3): 194-224.
** [[:study:Beghtol, C. (1995). Domain analysis, literary warrant, and consensus]]: The case of fiction studies. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 46(1), 30-44.
** Fry, J. (2006). Scholarly research and information practices: a domain analytic approach. Information Processing and Management, 42(1), 299-316.
** Fuller, S. (1988). Social Epistemology. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. Chap. 8: Disciplinary Boundaries: A Conceptual Map of the Field.
** Gal, S., & Irvine, J. T. (1995). The boundaries of languages and disciplines: How ideologies construct difference. Social Research, 62(4), 967-1001.
** Hjørland, B. (1992). The concept of “subject” in information science. Journal of Documentation. 48(2): 172-200.
** Palmer, C. L., & Neumann, L. (2002). The information work of interdisciplinary humanities scholars: Exploration and translation." Library Quarterly 72: 85-117. 
** Simmons, M. H. (2005). Librarians as disciplinary discourse mediators: using genre theory to move toward critical information literacy. Libraries and Academy 5(3), 297-311.

====6月1日 Library Classification (1)====
* Beghtol, C. (1986). Bibliographic Classification Theory and Text Linguistics: Aboutness Analysis, Intertextuality and the Cognitive Act of Classifying Documents.  Journal of Documentation, 42(2): 84-113.
* Hunter, E. (2000). Do we still need classification? In R. Marcella & A. Maltby (Eds.), The Future of Classification (pp. 1-17). Hampshire: Gower.
* [[:study:Kwasnik, B. H. (1992). The role of classification structures in reflecting and building theory]]. Advances in Classification Research(3), 63-81.
* [[:study:Losee, R. M. (1993). Seven fundamental questions for the science of library classification]]. Knowledge Organization, 20(2), 65-70.
* Miksa, F. L. (1992). The concept of the universe of knowledge and the purpose of LIS classification. In N.J. Williamson & M. Hudon (Eds.), Classification Research for Knowledge Representation and Organization (pp. 101-126). New York: Elsevier Science Pub.
* (optional）
** Hjørland, Birger, & Albrechtsen, Hanne. (1999). An analysis of some trends in classification research. Knowledge Organization, 26(3): 131-139.
** Langridge, D. W. (1995). Alternative starting points in classification. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 19 (3/4), 7-15.
** Losee, R. M. (1995). How to study classification systems and their appropriateness for individual institutions. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 19 (3/4), 45-58.
** Maltby, A., & Marcella, R. (2000). Organizing knowledge: The need for system and unity. In R. Marcella & A. Maltby (Eds.), The Future of Classification (pp. 19-31). Hampshire: Gower.
** Marcella, R., & Newton, R. (1994). A New Manual of Classification. Hampshire: Gower. Chap. 1 & 2.
** Miksa, F. L. (1993). Classification. 
** Miksa, F. L. (1998). The DDC, the Universe of knowledge, and the Post-Modern Library, pp. 33-82. 
** Neelameghan, A. Theory of classification: Emergence of general theory of library classification. In Encyclopedia of Library and Information Science, v. 5, pp. 147-174.
** Poli, R. (1996). Ontology for knowledge organization. In R. Green (Ed.), Knowledge Organization and Change (Proceedings of the 4m International ISKO Conference, 15-18 July 1996, Washington, D.C.) (313-319). Frankfurt/Main: Indeks Verlag. Available online: http://www.mitteleuropafoundation.it/Papers/RP/Ontology%20for%20knowledge%20organization.pdf
** Quinn, B. (1994). Recent theoretical approaches in classification and indexing. Knowledge Organization, 21(3), 140-147.
** Rafferty, Pauline (2001). The representation of knowledge in library classification schemes. Knowledge Organization, 28(4): 180-191. 
** Short, E. C. (1995). Knowledge and the educational purposes of higher education: Implications for the design of a classification scheme. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 19 (3/4), 59-66.
** Svenonius, E. (1992). Classification: Prospects, problems and possibilities. In N. J. Williamson, & M. Hudon (Eds.), Classification Research for Knowledge Representation and Organization (pp. 5-25). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
** Svenonius, E. (2000). The Intellectual Foundation of Information Organization. Chap. 8, 9, & 10.
** Taylor, A. G. (2004). The Organization of Information. 2nd ed. Chap. 11.

====6月8日 Library Classification (2)====
* Bliss, H. E. (1929). The Organization of Knowledge and the System of the Sciences. New York: Henry Holt. Chap. 11, 12, & 13
* Ranganathan, S. R. (1967). Prolegomena to Library Classification. 3rd. ed. Bombay: Asia Publishing House, pp. 54-96.
* Richardson, Ernest C. (1930). Classification: Theoretical and practical. 3rd ed. New York: H.W. Wilson, pp. 1-42. 
* [[:study:Beghtol, C. (1989). Access to fiction]]: A problem in classification theory and practice. Part I.  International Classification, 16(3): 134-140.
* Beghtol, C. (1990). Access to fiction: A problem in classification theory and practice. Part II.  International Classification, 17(4): 21-27.
* Beghtol, C. (1986). Semantic validity: Concepts of warrant in bibliographic classification systems. Library Resources & Technical Services, 30(2), 109-125.
* (optional）
** Aitchison, J. (1986). A classification as a source for a thesaurus: The Bibliographic Classification of H. E. Bliss as a source of thesaurus terms and structure. Journal of Documentation, 42(3), 161-181
** Beghtol, C. (1994). The Classification of Fiction: The Development of a System Based on Theoretical Principles. Metuchen, NJ: Scarecrow Press. Chap. 2-5.
** Foskett, D. J. (1992). Ranganathan and user-friendliness. Libri, 42(3), 227-234.
** McIlwaine, I. C. (1997). The Universal Decimal Classification: Some factors concerning its origins, development and influence. Journal of the American Society of Information Science, 48(4), 331-339.
** Satija, M. P. (1997). The revision and future of Colon Classification. Knowledge Organization, 24(1), 18-23.
** Star, S. L. (1998). Grounded classification: Grounded theory and faceted classification. Library Trends, 47(2), 218-232.
** Thomas, A. R. (1995). Blissful beliefs: Henry Evelyn Bliss counsels on classification. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 19 (3/4), 17-22.

====6月15日	（Language and Knowledge Presentation）-- tentative ====
* Benediktsson, D. (1989). Hermeneutics: Dimensions toward LIS thinking. Library and Information Science Research, 11, 201-234.
* Blair, D. C. (2003). Information retrieval and the philosophy of language. In Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, V.37 (pp. 3-50). Medford, NJ: Information Today.
* Kaplan, A. (1964). The age of the symbol: A philosophy of library education. Library Quarterly, 34, 295-304.
* Warner, J. (1990). Semiotics, information science documents and computers. Journal of Documentation, 46(1), 16-32.
* Wright, H. C. (1986). The symbol and its referent: An issue for library education. Library Trends, 34(4), 729-776. 
* (optional）
** Blair, D. C. (1990). Language and Representation in Information Retrieval. Amsterdam ; New York : Elsevier Science Publishers. 
** Blair, D. C. (1992). Information retrieval and the philosophy of language. Computer Journal 35(3), 200-207.
** Cornelius, Ian. 1996. Meaning and Method in Information Studies.  Norwood, NJ: Ablex. Chapter 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7.
** Eco, U. (1999). Kant and the Platypus: Essays on Language and Cognition. London: Secker & Warburg. Chap. 4: The Platypus Between the Dictionary and Encyclopedia (pp. 224-279).
** Olson, H. A. (2002). The Power to Name: Locating the Limits of Subject Representation in Libraries. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
** 翁貝爾托‧埃科(Umberto Eco)著，王天清譯。符號學與語言哲學。天津：百花文藝出版社，2005。
** 索爾‧克里普克(Saul Kripke)著，梅文譯。命名與必然性。上海：上海譯文出版社，2005。
====6月22日 （Presentation and Discussion）====
6月28日下午5點以前繳交期末報告

===指定讀物===
任選一本閱讀
* Bowker, G., & Star, S. L. (1999). Sorting Thing Out: Classification and Its Consequences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
* Iyer, H. (1995). Classificatory Structures: Concepts, Relations, and Representation. Frankfurt: Indeks Verlag.
* Langridge, D. W. (1992). Classification: Its Kinds, Elements, Systems and Applications. London: Bowker-Saur.
* Szostak, R. (2004). Classifying Science: Phenomena, Data, Theory, Method, Practice. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
=== References ===

* 左玉河（2004）。從四部之學到七科之學：學術分科與近代中國知識系統之創建。上海：上海書店。
* 何光國(民79)。圖書資訊組織原理。台北市 : 三民。
* 何光國(民90)。圖書館學理論基礎。台北：三民。
* 余慶蓉，王晉卿（1998）。中國目錄學思想史。湖南教育出版社。
* 周彥文(民84)。中國目錄學理論。台北市：臺灣學生。
* [[:study:張慧銖._2003_._圖書館目錄發展研究|張慧銖(民92)。圖書館目錄發展研究]]。台北市：文華圖書館管理。
* 高紅(2008)。編目思想史。北京：北京圖書館出版社。
* 陳洪瀾（2008）。知識分類與知識資源認識論。北京：人民出版社。
* 傅榮賢(民88)。中國古代圖書分類學研究。台北市：臺灣學生。
* Batley, S. (2005). Classification in Theory and Practice. Oxford: Chandos.
* Bean, C. A., & Green, R. (2001). Relationships in the Organization of Knowledge.  Dordrecht ; Boston : Kluwer Academic Publishers.  
* Beghtol, C. (1986). Bibliographic Classification Theory and Text Linguistics: Aboutness Analysis, Intertextuality and the Cognitive Act of Classifying Documents.  Journal of Documentation, 42(2): 84-113.
* Beghtol, C. (1989). Access to Fiction: A Problem in Classification Theory and Practice. Part I.  International  Classification, 16(3): 134-140.
* Beghtol, C. (1990). Access to Fiction: A Problem in Classification Theory and Practice. Part II.  International Classification, 17 (4): 21-27 .
* Beghtol, C. (1995). “Facets” as Interdisciplinary Undiscovered Public Knowledge.  Journal of Documentation, 51(3): 194-224.
* Beghtol, C. (1998). Knowledge Domains: Multidisciplinary and Bibliographic Classification Systems. Knowledge Organization, 25 (1/2): 1-12.
* Bengtson, B. G., & Hill, J. S. (Eds.) (1990). Classification of Library Materials: Current and Future Potential for Providing Access. New York: Neal-Schuman.
* Blair, D. C. (1990). Language and Representation in Information Retrieval. Amsterdam ; New York : Elsevier Science Publishers. 
* Bliss, H. E. (1929). The Organization of Knowledge and the System of the Sciences. New York: Henry Holt. 
* Borgman, C. L. (2000). From Gutenberg to the Global Information Infrastructure: Access to Information in the Networked World. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.
* Bowker, G., & Star, S. L. (1999). Sorting Thing Out: Classification and Its Consequences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
* Broughton, V. (2004). Essential Classification. London: Facet Publishing.
* Buchanan, B. (1979). Theory of Library Classification. London: Clive Bingley.
Burke, P. (2000). A Social History of Knowledge: From Gutenberg to Diderot.  Cambridge, UK: Polity. [中譯本書名：知識社會史，麥田出版]
* Carpenter, M., & Svenonius, E. (Eds.) (1985). Foundations of Cataloging: A Sourcebook.  Littleton, Colo. : Libraries Unlimited. 
* Carter, R. C. (2000). Managing Cataloging and the Organization of Information : Philosophies, Practices, and Challenges at the Onset of the 21st Century. Binghamton, NY : Haworth Information Press. 
* Chan, L. M. (2007). Cataloging and Classification: An Introduction. 3rd ed. Lanham, MD.: Scarecrow Press.
* Chan, L. M., Richmond, P. A., & Svenonius, E. (Eds.) (1985). Theory of Subject Analysis: A Sourcebook.  Littleton, Colo. : Libraries Unlimited. 
* Chowdhury, G. G., & Chowdhury, S. (2007). Organizing Information from the Shelf to the Web. London: Facet Publishing.
Dreyfus, H L. and Rabinow, P. (1983) Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics. 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 
* Eco, U. (1999). Kant and the Platypus:  Essays on Language and Cognition. London: Secker & Warburg. 
* Ellen, R. F., & Reason, D. (Eds). (1979).  Classifications in Their Social Context.  London: Academic Press.
* Ereshefsky, M. (2001). The Poverty of the Linnaean Hierarchy: A Philosophical Study of Biological Taxonomy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
* Foskett, A. C. (1996). The Subject Approach to Information (5th ed.). London : Library Association Pub. 
* Foucault, M. (1972). The Archaeology of Knowledge and The Discourse on Language. New York: Pantheon Books.
* Foucault, M. (1973). The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences. New York: Vintage Books.
* [FRBR] (1998). Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records: Final Report / IFLA Study Group on the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records ; approved by the Standing Committee of the IFLA Section on Cataloguing. Munchen : K.G. Saur.  Available online: http://www.ifla.org/VII/s13/frbr/frbr.pdf
* Green, R., Bean, C. A., & Myaeng, S. H. (Eds.) (2002). The Semantics of Relationships: An Interdisciplinary Perspectives. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Pub.
* Hacking, I. (1999). The Social Construction of What? Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. 
* Hjørland, B. (1997). Information Seeking and Subject Representation: An Activity-Theoretical Approach to Information Science. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press.
* Iyer, H. (1995). Classificatory Structures: Concepts, Relations, and Representation. Frankfurt: Indeks Verlag.
* Jagerman, E. J. (2006). Creating, Maintaining and Applying Quality Taxonomies. Zoetermeer: E. J. Jagerman.
* Kumar, K. (1983). Theory of Classification, 3rd ed. New Delhi: Vikas House.
* Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, Fire and Dangerous Things:  What Categories Reveal About the Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. [中譯本書名：女人、火與危險事物，桂冠出版]
* Lamerts, K., & Shanks, D. (Eds.) (1997). Knowledge, Concepts and Categories. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.  
* Langridge, D. W. (1992). Classification: Its Kinds, Elements, Systems and Applications. London: Bowker-Saur.
* Marcella, R., & Maltby, A. (Eds.) (2000). The Future of Classification. Aldershot, Eng.; Brookfield, VT: Gower.
* Maltby, A. (Ed.) (1976). Classification in the 1970s: A Second Look, rev. ed. London: Clive Bingley.
* Mayr, E. (1982). The Growth of Biological Thought: Diversity, Evolution, and Inheritance. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
* Mayr, E, (1988). Toward a New Philosophy of Biology. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
* Miksa, F. L. (1993). Classification. In W. A. Wiegard, & D. G. Davis (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Library History (pp. 144-153). New York : Garland Pub.
* Miksa, F. L. (1998). The DDC, the Universe of knowledge, and the Post-Modern Library. Albany, NY: OCLC. 
* Olson, H. A., & Boll, J. J. (2001). Subject Analysis in Online Catalogs. Englewood, Colo: Libraries Unlimited.
* Painter, A. F. (Ed.) (1972). Reader in Classification and Descriptive Cataloging. Washington, DC: The National Cash Register Company. 
* Ranganathan, S. R. (1962).  Elements of library classification.  3rd ed.  Bombay: Asia Publishing House.  Chapters A – E (pp. 8-41).
* Ranganathan, S. R. (1967). Prolegomena to Library Classification. 3rd. ed. Bombay: Asia Publishing House.
* Ranganathan, S. R. (1973).  Classification and Communication.  Bangalore: Sarada Ranganathan Endowment for Library Science. 
* Ranganathan, S. R. (1987).  Colon Classification.  7th ed.  Bangalore: Sarada Ranganathan Endowment for Library Science.
* Rowley, J., & Farrow, J. (2002). Organizing Knowledge: An Introduction to Managing Access to Information (3rd ed.). Aldershot, Hampshire, England ; Burlington, Vt. : Ashgate. 
* Sayers, W. C. B. (1975). Sayers’ Manual of Classification for Librarians, 5th ed. London : Deutsch. (Revised by A. Maltby)
* Shera, J. H., & Egan, M. E. (Eds.) (1951). Bibliographic Organization: Papers Presented before the Fifteenth Annual Conference of the Graduate Library School, July 24-29, 1950.  Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
* Smiraglia, R. P. (2001). The Nature of “a Work”: Implications for the Organization of Knowledge.  Lanham, Md. : Scarecrow Press. 
* Smiraglia, R. P. (Ed.) (2002). Works as Entities for Information Retrieval. New York: Haworth Information Press.
* Smith, E. E., & Medin, D. L. (1981). Concepts and Categories. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
* Sokal, R. (1974). Classification: Purposes, principles, progress, prospects. Science, 185 (no. 4157): 1115-1123
* Svenonius, E. (Ed.) (1989). The Conceptual Foundations of Descriptive Cataloging.  San Diego : Academic Press. 
* [[:study:Svenonius, E. (2000). The Intellectual Foundation of Information Organization]].  Cambridge, Mass. : MIT Press, 2000. 
* Szostak, R. (2004). Classifying Science: Phenomena, Data, Theory, Method, Practice. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
* Vickery, B. C. (1959). Classification and Indexing in Science. London: Butterworth. 
* Weinberber, D. (2007).  Everything Is Miscellaneous: The Power of the New Digital Disorder.  New York: Times Books. [中譯本書名：亂是一種新商機，天下遠見出版社，2008]
* Taylor, A. G. (2004). The Organization of Information. 2nd ed. Englewood, Colo.: Libraries Unlimited.
* Taylor, A. G. (2006). Introduction to Cataloging and Classification. 10th ed. Englewood, Colo.: Libraries Unlimited.
* Vickery, B. C. (1959). Classification and Indexing in Science. London: Butterworth. 
* Williamson, N. J., & Beghtor, C. (Eds.) (2003). Knowledge Organization and Classification in International Information Retrieval. Binghamton, NY: Haworth Press.
* Williamson, N. J., & Hudon, M. (1992). Classification Research for Knowledge Representation and Organization. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
* Wilson, P. (1968). Two Kinds of Power: An Essay on Bibliographical Control. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

* Lifeboat for Knowledge Organization compiled by Birger Hjørland http://www.db.dk/bh/lifeboat_ko/home.htm 
* The Epistemological Lifeboat: Epistemology and Philosophy of Science for Information Scientists compiled by Birger Hjorland and Jeppe Nicolaisen.  http://www.db.dk/jni/lifeboat/ 
* The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy  http://www.iep.utm.edu 
* Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy Online  http://www.rep.routledge.com/ 
* Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy http://plato.stanford.edu/


{{tag>Information_organization classification categorization}}